What needs to be thought - not stated but considered, I mean that, as conjecture, considered as possible- is that it's now imperative to whatever placed Bush in office that he be removed, but that enough light has been shining on those strings and cables behind the scenes that it has to look like the "will of the people". There were some weeks there when it looked like it would be just the same for Kerry, a fawning media, a barrage of positive images, the loser shot from his bad side sinking into well-deserved oblivion, but people are waking up, the media doesn't have complete control now. So there's this kind of pussy-footing. Tip-toe. Can't be too obvious about backing Kerry. But have to get rid of Bush for the one-two to work.
Chalabi makes no sense in this present iteration. No sense at all. Conscienceless delusional power-mad all-the-bad-adjective villains suddenly have no control whatsoever,
but they still look smug. Maybe that's the personality type. No matter what, the last moves are beginning.
It's gambit time as the end-game opens up.
-
Also in the long long range crazy projection files - what if Israel and China team up? That's a custom-made relationship waiting to happen. And what would be the biggest obstacle to that nuptial? A strong and well-regarded, economically thriving US.
-
The unthinkable in this instance being that the obvious weakening of America, the complete degradation of American honor and good will in the world, is intentional, not an accidental by-product of neo-con Straussian Zionism and good-ol'-boy petro-lust. That behind all this is something that doesn't have its roots in American soil.
Because after this crisis has passed, after the smoke and dust settle, if they do, America is going to be a limping bleeding husk of what it was.
So what I'm saying here is to conjecture, consider, contemplate - could it be, I'm not saying it is - try it out, does it fit?
Could it be that the real goal has nothing to do with America being central to the plan, that the US as a strong participant in world affairs, especially a commitment to American principles and ideals, is a threat to whatever's behind this carnage and atrocity?
These are conjectures. Not observations. Irresponsible in a public forum maybe, but this isn't a public forum exactly. So they're more like hairballs, something to purge. To get out and be rid of, in order to go on with the business of the day.
